Monday, 2 March 2009

five not so good images!

Here are five of my bad images i have taken for this project. 
I got two of my friends dressed up as women, then took them to a pub carpark near our halls basically to keep it simple for my first shoot. I have never really done this before your comments and most importantly help on how i can take better ones next time would be most appreciated. 







DAM i have under sized them !! you will have to wait for my prints on thursday. x

Thursday, 26 February 2009

I didn't no what to write for my second post but what the hell!!!
might give a few of us some ideas ? 

enjoy.

Walker Evans. (modernist)

vs

Jeff Wall. (postmodernist)


 CONTEXT!!


I believe modernism came to a hault, in a photographic format certainly. A very formal construction was composed time and time again. Postmodernist created a much more contextual idea to there work. The concept for making was much more intensely methodized. Modernist photographers maybe recorded time in a structural form? It was more about through the lens rather then the process undertaken before the shoot. I believe that’s the difference and that’s why the art genre or ‘category’ was influenced.

Modernist artists/photographers did use ‘emotional manipulation’ in ways of expressing inner feelings. Stieglitz especially created a series of artwork called ‘equivalents’ he would photograph and present images of skylines to express they way he is feeling or felt at the time of production. Just like the expressive painting of Jackson Pollock in the 60’s. His brush strokes and colour choice represented the feeling of the painter ‘Pollock’. But how do we know this is true?

As we progressed into the post-modern era art moved with the music scene. Music became a huge part of the young generations lives. Clothing was becoming more revealing just like photography. Cindy Sherman was arguably the one who really moved the period of modernism to the postmodern era. 'apparently'

The series of movie stills included were huge actresses at the time. The collection of images produced can be read in several ways. I read them as stereotyped characters, a blonde beautiful perfected ‘famous’ woman of the contemporary society. But also read them as sexual beautiful and seductive. The way the arm is bent in an innocent glare towards the person who isn’t featured in any of the frames. It creates a sense of interest of knowing who else is involved in the scene. I find it interesting how the stereotype of Sherman’s images fit in well with ‘sexual’, ‘seductive’ and the female almost in power. You start to realize the difference in way women are portrayed in postmodern art in contrast with most Modernist artwork.
Sherman explained to the media. “The male half of society has structured the whole language of how women see and think about themselves.”
Basically saying this is how men see the classic cliches of the female presented in films, television, advertising, magazines and even art.



Basically if you were in the seminar today you would of heard my idea!
from a little help from Hugh etc i basically want to show how men are viewed in society instead of women for once. I will included the femanine side of the male and how it may be portrayed by the viewer.

So expect lots of cross dressing and hairy legs. You maybe asking the question of are you answering the project briefs question! 
I suppose i am as its a 'thought' thinking is a huge part of 'our world'. Do males have a femanine side? 

your comments on photographers i could look at would be brilliant ! and what do you think to my idea ?

Thursday, 19 February 2009

Hello, My first post hope you enjoy.

MY WORLD.


I know Hugh won't enjoy Billingham's work been put up here as he doesn't like the fact he is 'thick' as stated in today's seminar. But i disagree, if you i was wanting to go into the direction of working with family i personally  believe he is the most influential photographer for this 'genre'. My family aren't as bizarre so i don't no if the idea would be as suitable. Billingham's work was accused of exploitation, for his fathers drinking problems', Billingham's work can be read in two ways. first of all noing its a real family in real-life situations you can be quite emotionally disturbed. I view the family in poverty but at the same time looking into the images you can see that they have so many possessions. Possessions such as pot dolls and well polished cutlery. The other way Billingham's work can be viewed is from a comical perspective. Especially in the example given. The innocence of his father as his wife clenches her fist.


William Klein, Fifth Avenue, graceline, New York.
Klein's work has a really strong connection to this project. He photographs everyday life in a way in which you see the world from other peoples view point. Basically what I'm trying to say is his images have a certain quality about them in the manner of which the people look so integrated and absorbed in the energy of the city they don't even recognise the camera is there.
'yes we know the camera took the shot but at the same time i find it intriguing how people ignore its there and just get on with everyday life'



Garry Winogrand.
Here is another example of a similar style of photography. In the way in which people are so absorbed in the atmosphere of whats happening at the time of the shot.




Here is one of my own images with a similar relation to the above two.



im hungry now! off for tea
test blog